Polish communication network and its main axes
Main Article Content
Abstract
An inalienable property of the linguistic reality is the multi-language nature of the world and the multi-variation character of the ethnic-national communication space. As regards Polish pace, one can distinguish a series of axes around which the processes of long lasting concentrate. The author discusses the following five axes: (1) idiolectal (individual languages), (2) one determined by the dichotomy: spoken language - written language (contemporarily it assumes the form: spoken language - media language - written language), (3) one connected with the opposition: dialects - literary language (today in the form: dialects - mixed languages - general language), (4) functional variations (their ‘canonical’ series: colloquial language - scientific language - journalistic language - language of the administration - religious language - artistic language), and (5) one of three styles (high - medium - low).
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author, submitting a text to the editorial board of the journal “Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Linguistica", certifies that the content of the article has not been published so far and that the work does not violate in any way the copyright or related rights of other person, as well as other rights of third parties, and that no one's rights to the work (or any part thereof) have been missed. After signing the contract, the property rights to the published materials are transferred to the Scientific Publisher of the University of the National Education Commission, Krakow.
“Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Linguistica” is an open access journal, and all its content is made available free of charge to users and institutions under the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license (attribution, non-commercial use, no derivative works). Under this license, the authors agree that their work may be lawfully reused for any purpose, except for commercial purposes, without the prior consent of the author or publisher. Everyone can read, download, copy, print, distribute and process these works, provided that the author's marking and the original publication place are correct. Published texts may not be used to create derivative works (e.g. to translate and publish in another language without the consent of the publisher). This is in line with the BOAI (Budapest Open Access Initiative) definition. "Studia Linguistica" does not charge for submitting or processing articles.
References
Bogołębska B., 1996, Tradycje retoryczne w stylistyce polskiej: narodziny dyscypliny, Łódź.
Google Scholar
Budzyk K. (red.), 1946, Stylistyka teoretyczna w Polsce, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Gajda S. (red.), 1995, Przewodnik po stylistyce polskiej, Opole.
Google Scholar
Gajda S., 2019, Polska polityka językowa 1918–2018, [w:] Niepodległa wobec języka polskiego, red. R. Przybylska i in., Kraków, s. 13–27.
Google Scholar
Gajda S., 2021, Lingwoekologia – ochrona języka przed człowiekiem i człowieka przed językiem, „Poradnik Językowy”, nr 3, s. 85–98.
Google Scholar
Hausenblas K., 1973, Vysoký – střední – nízký styl a diferenciace stylů dnes, „Slovo a slovesnost” 1, s. 85–91.
Google Scholar
Kiklewicz A., 2010, Kategorie lingwistyki komunikacyjnej, socjolingwistyki i hermeneutyki lingwistycznej w ujęciu systemowym, Łask.
Google Scholar
Kurkowska H., Skorupka S., 1959, Stylistyka polska. Zarys, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Malinowska E., Nocoń J., Żydek-Bednarczuk U. (red.), 2013, Style współczesnej polszczyzny. Przewodnik po stylistyce polskiej, Kraków.
Google Scholar
Mayenowa M.R. (red.), 1966, Praska szkoła strukturalna w latach 1926–1948. Wybór materiałów, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Mayenowa M.R., Saloni Z. (oprac.), 1970, Rosyjska szkoła stylistyki, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Ong W.J., 1992, Oralność i piśmienność. Słowo poddane technologii, Lublin.
Google Scholar
Skowronek B., 2013, Mediolingwistyka. Wprowadzenie, Kraków.
Google Scholar
Skubalanka T., 1984, Historyczna stylistyka języka polskiego. Przekroje, Wrocław.
Google Scholar
Stróżewski T., 2004, Ontologia, Kraków.
Google Scholar
Wilkoń A., 1987, Typologia odmian językowych współczesnej polszczyzny, Katowice.
Google Scholar
Zagajewski A., 1999, Uwagi o wysokim stylu, „Zeszyty Literackie” 1, z. 65, s. 10–25.
Google Scholar
Zawadzki B., Strelau J., Szczepaniak P., Śliwińska M., 2007, Inwentarz Osobowości NEO-FFI Paula T. Costy Jr i Roberta R. McCrea. Adaptacja polska, Warszawa.
Google Scholar