Semantic relation between lexical units roślina (‘plant’) and zwierzę (‘animal’) – determining the relation based on lexicographic and corpus analyses

Main Article Content

Nawoja Mikołajczak-Matyja
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2282-8960

Abstract

The paper presents an attempt to test whether the semantic relation between the lexical units roślina (‘plant’) and zwierzę (‘animal’) can be interpreted as a relation of binary opposition. The relationship was tested by analysing definitions contained in 10 contemporary dictionaries of the Polish language and by searching in sentences from the National Corpus of Polish for a set of oppositional pair functions, used in recent decades in works on various languages. The analyses carried out do not allow to unequivocally qualify the relationship between the words roślina and zwierzę as a binary semantic opposition. It was found that the words are rarely treated in Polish dictionaries as hyponyms of the same closest hyperonym and that they are rarely defined by features that clearly contrast their meaning. In the set of 1,291 sentences from the corpus in which the words roślina and zwierzę co‑occur, it was possible to extract most of the functions characteristic of typical examples of pairs with opposite meanings, with sentences with such functions accounting for almost 90% of the analysed set of sentences. However, the total share of functions emphasizing the differences between plants and animals is more than three times smaller than the total share of functions from the difference‑reducing group.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mikołajczak-Matyja, N. (2025) “Semantic relation between lexical units roślina (‘plant’) and zwierzę (‘animal’) – determining the relation based on lexicographic and corpus analyses”, ANNALES UNIVERSITATIS PAEDAGOGICAE CRACOVIENSIS. STUDIA LINGUISTICA, (20), pp. 203–217. doi: 10.24917/20831765.20.12.
Section
Articles

References

Arystoteles, 2003, O roślinach, [w:] Arystoteles, Dzieła wszystkie, t. IV, Warszawa, tłum. i komentarz L. Regner, s. 335–386.
Google Scholar

Bańczerowski J., Pogonowski J., Zgółka T., 1982, Wstęp do językoznawstwa, Poznań.
Google Scholar

Cruse D.A., 1995, Lexical Semantics, Cambridge.
Google Scholar

Davies M., 2012, A new approach to oppositions in discourse: The role of syntactic frames in the triggering of noncanonical oppositions, „Journal of English Linguistics” XL(1), s. 41–73.
Google Scholar

Davies M., 2013, Oppositions and Ideology in News Discourse, London.
Google Scholar

Hammerl R., Sambor J., 1993, O statystycznych prawach językowych, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Hassanein H., 2018, Discourse functions of opposition in Classical Arabic: The case in Ḥadīth genre, „Lingua” CCI, s. 18–44.
Google Scholar

Hassanein H., Mahzari M., 2021, A taxonomy of antonymy in Arabic: Egyptian and Saudi proverbs in comparison, „Open Linguistics” VII, s. 200–222.
Google Scholar

Hsu Ch.-Ch., 2015, A syntagmatic analysis of antonym co‑occurrences in Chinese: Contrastive constructions and co‑occurrence sequences, „Corpora” X(1), s. 47–82.
Google Scholar

Hurford J.R., Heasley B., Smith M.B., 2007, Semantics: A Coursebook, Cambridge.
Google Scholar

Jones S., 2002, Antonymy: A Corpus‑based Perspective, London.
Google Scholar

Jones S., 2006, A lexico‑syntactic analysis of antonym co‑occurrence in spoken English, „Text & Talk – An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies” XXVI(2), s. 191–216.
Google Scholar

Jones S., 2007, ‘Opposites’ in discourse: A comparison of antonym use across four domains, „Journal of Pragmatics” XXXIX(6), s. 1105–1119.
Google Scholar

Jones S., Murphy L.M., 2005, Using corpora to investigate antonym acquisition, „International Journal of Corpus Linguistics” X(3), s. 401–422.
Google Scholar

Karpiński S.M., 2022, Rośliny ze sobą rozmawiają, „Academia” LXXI(3), s. 67–69, DOI: 10.24425/academiaPAN.2022.143473.
Google Scholar

Kostić N., 2015, Antonymy in language use: From core members to ad hoc couplings, „Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics” LI(1), s. 133–161.
Google Scholar

Lobanova A., Van Der Kleij T., Spenader J., 2010, Defining antonymy: A corpus‑based study of opposites by lexico‑syntactic patterns, „International Journal of Lexicography” XXIII(1), s. 19–53.
Google Scholar

Lyons J., 1984, Semantyka, t. 1., tłum. A. Weinsberg, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Markowski A., 1986, Antonimy przymiotnikowe we współczesnej polszczyźnie na tle innych typów przeciwstawień leksykalnych, Wrocław.
Google Scholar

Mettinger A., 1994, Aspects of Semantic Opposition in English, Oxford.
Google Scholar

Mikołajczak‑Matyja N., 2021, Funkcje pary leksemów ‘mężczyzna’ i ‘kobieta’ w zdaniach z Narodowego Korpusu Języka Polskiego i ich zastosowanie do badań nad stereotypami płci, „Prace Językoznawcze” XXIII(3), s. 115–131.
Google Scholar

Mohamadi M.K, Reza A., Famian A.R.G., Aghagolzadeh F., Afrashi A., 2019, Syntactic frameworks and discourse functions of lexical antonymy in Persian language, „Journal of Zabanpazhuhi” („Scientific Journal of Language Research”) XI(30), s. 149–177.
Google Scholar

Muehleisen V., Isono M., 2009, Antonymous adjectives in Japanese discourse, „Journal of Pragmatics” XLI(11), s. 2185–2203.
Google Scholar

Murphy M.L., 2003, Semantic Relations and the Lexicon, Cambridge.
Google Scholar

Murphy M.L., Paradis C., Willners C., Jones S., 2009, Discourse functions of antonymy: A cross‑linguistic investigation of Swedish and English, „Journal of Pragmatics” XLI(11), s. 2159–2184.
Google Scholar

Murphy M.L., Jones S., Koskela A., 2015, Signals of contrastiveness: But, oppositeness, and formal similarity in parallel contexts, „Journal of English Linguistics” XLIII(3), s. 227–249.
Google Scholar

Schollenberger J., 2018, Rośliny w pędzie. Darwina myślenie o granicy roślina – zwierzę, „Teksty Drugie” II, s. 102–119.
Google Scholar

Steffens M., 2018, Antonymic discourse functions and manipulation: a corpus analysis of present‑day French, „Corpus Pragmatics” II(3), s. 313–332.
Google Scholar

Whittaker R.H., 1969, New concepts of kingdoms of organisms, „Science” CLXIII(3863), s. 150–160.
Google Scholar

Woese C.R., Balch W.E., Magrum L.J., Fox G.E., Wolfe R.S., 1977, An ancient divergence among the bacteria, „Journal of Molecular Evolution” IX(4), s. 305–311.
Google Scholar

Źródła internetowe:
Google Scholar

Biblia Tysiąclecia, https://biblia.deon.pl/ (dostęp 15.10.2024).
Google Scholar

Górski R.L., Łaziński M., 2012, Reprezentatywność i zrównoważenie korpusu, [w:] Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego, red. A. Przepiórkowski i in., s. 25–36, http://nkjp.pl/settings/papers/NKJP_ksiazka.pdf (dostęp 01.10.2024–15.10.2024).
Google Scholar

Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego, http://www.nkjp.pl (dostęp 01.07.2024–30.11.2024).
Google Scholar

SJPPWN online: Słownik języka polskiego PWN, https://sjp.pwn.pl/slowniki/ (dostęp 01.10.2024–31.10.2024).
Google Scholar

Słowosieć, http://plwordnet.pwr.wroc.pl/wordnet/ (dostęp 01.10.2024–31.10.2024).
Google Scholar