The image of agricultural tools preserved in Polish phraseology and paremiology
Main Article Content
Abstract
The object of analysis in this paper are fixedword combinations (phraseological units and proverbs) with components denoting names of agricultural tools. They were used to conceptualize numerous ideas connected not only with the appearance of tools and agricultural work done, but also with various aspects of individual and collective life. Most of the analysed phrasemes already belong to the recessive sphere of phraseology. In order to understand them completely, it is necessary to have some knowledge of what they look like, what purpose they served and what kind of work was done with their use, which is not always clear to people who don’t know anything about the village reality.
Downloads
Article Details
Author, submitting a text to the editorial board of the journal “Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Linguistica", certifies that the content of the article has not been published so far and that the work does not violate in any way the copyright or related rights of other person, as well as other rights of third parties, and that no one's rights to the work (or any part thereof) have been missed. After signing the contract, the property rights to the published materials are transferred to the Scientific Publisher of the University of the National Education Commission, Krakow.
“Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Linguistica” is an open access journal, and all its content is made available free of charge to users and institutions under the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license (attribution, non-commercial use, no derivative works). Under this license, the authors agree that their work may be lawfully reused for any purpose, except for commercial purposes, without the prior consent of the author or publisher. Everyone can read, download, copy, print, distribute and process these works, provided that the author's marking and the original publication place are correct. Published texts may not be used to create derivative works (e.g. to translate and publish in another language without the consent of the publisher). This is in line with the BOAI (Budapest Open Access Initiative) definition. "Studia Linguistica" does not charge for submitting or processing articles.
References
Bartmiński J., 2006, Językowe podstawy obrazu świata, Lublin.
Google Scholar
Grzegorczykowa R., Puzynina J., 1984, Słowotwórstwo rzeczowników, [w:] Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego. Składnia – Morfologia – Fonologia, red. naukowy S. Urbańczyk; t. 2, R. Grzegorczykowa, K. Kallas, K. Kowalik, R. Laskowski, A. Orzechowska, J. Puzynina, H. Wróbel, Morfologia, s. 332–407.
Google Scholar
Grzegorczykowa R., Szymanek B., 1993, Kategorie słowotwórcze w perspektywie kognitywnej, [w:] Współczesny język polski, red. J. Bartmiński, Wrocław, s. 458–474.
Google Scholar
Jaros I., 2009, Nazwy środków czynności w gwarach łęczycko-sieradzkich. Studium słowotwórczo-leksykalne, Łódź.
Google Scholar
Koziara S., 2001, Frazeologia biblijna w języku polskim, Kraków.
Google Scholar
Kucała M., 1957, Porównawczy słownik trzech wsi małopolskich, Wrocław.
Google Scholar
Markowski A., 1992, Leksyka wspólna różnym odmianom polszczyzny, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Młynarczyk E., 2014, Obraz narzędzi rękodzielniczych w polskich frazeologizmach i przysłowiach, „Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Linguistica” IX, s. 30–39.
Google Scholar
Młynarczyk E., 2015, Nazwy narzędzi jako podstawa metonimicznego obrazowania w przysłowiach i w swobodnych połączeniach wyrazowych, [w:] Linguo-cultural research on phraseology, red. J. Szerszunowicz i in., Białystok, s. 225–238.
Google Scholar
Skorupka S., 1969, Podstawy klasyfikacji jednostek frazeologicznych, „Prace Filologiczne”, t. XIX, s. 219–226.
Google Scholar
Wyszyński S., 1956, Jasnogórskie Śluby Narodu Polskiego, http://www.wyszynski.psur. pl/sluby.php (dostęp: 31.05.2017).
Google Scholar